FBA Awards Melissa Wischerath the James M. Burns Federal Practice Award

Melissa Wischerath received the Honorable James M. Burns Federal Practice Award on May 26, 2016. Named in honor of a widely respected federal trial judge, the late James M. Burns, the Federal Bar Association for the District of Oregon (Oregon FBA) gives the award to lawyers who have “improved the practice of law before the U.S. District Court of Oregon.” The Oregon FBA selected Melissa for the award in recognition of her professionalism and her hours of service representing low income clients in the FBA's Pro Bono Appointment program.

 

"Lawyers square off over Josephine County GMO ban" - Wischerath argues to overturn Oregon's Seed Law

Mateusz Perkowski, Capital Press
Published on April 14, 2016 3:50PM

GRANTS PASS, Ore. — Farmers seeking to overturn the ban against genetically engineered crops in Oregon’s Josephine County have come under fire in court from proponents of the ordinance.

An April 14 court hearing over the validity of the county’s prohibition largely centered on whether the plaintiffs even have the right to challenge it.

“If you look at the circumstances, the whole house of cards of this manufactured lawsuit comes tumbling down,” said Stephanie Dolan, an attorney representing ordinance supporters, during oral arguments.

The fundamental dispute in the lawsuit is whether state law overrules the county’s prohibition against genetically modified organisms, or GMOs.

Oregon lawmakers pre-empted most local GMO regulations in 2013 but Josephine County voters nonetheless approved a ballot initiative banning such crops the following year.

Landowners Robert and Shelley Ann White filed a lawsuit challenging the GMO ordinance shortly before it was set to become effective in September 2015.

While the county government decided not to defend the ordinance, proponents of the ballot initiative — Oregonians for Safe Farms and Families and Siskiyou Seeds — voluntarily intervened in the case as defendants.

Those intervenors now claim the lawsuit should be thrown out because the Whites are “hobby farmers” who were “hand-picked” to serve as plaintiffs by biotech lobbyists intent on overturning the will of Josephine County voters.

The Whites say they’ve been prevented from growing biotech sugar beets on leased property.

They’ve asked Circuit Court Judge Pat Wolke to declare that the GMO ordinance is invalid and to permanently enjoin its enforcement.

Supporters of the GMO ban have responded by attacking the Whites’ legal standing to file the lawsuit.

During the oral arguments, the intervenors cast doubts on harm suffered by the Whites due to the ordinance.

“They need more than their general disdain for this ordinance to get into court,” said Melissa Wischerath, attorney for the intervenors.

In reality, the couple hasn’t proved to hold a valid contract with biotech developer Syngenta, which would be necessary to grow GMO sugar beets, according to the intervenors.

The Whites’ lease agreement to 100 acres, where the crop was supposedly going to be planted, is also not valid, the intervenors claim.

Since they have not demonstrated an actual financial hardship from the GMO ordinance, they cannot challenge its legality in court, Wischerath said.

“The mere interest in the subject matter — like the idea they’d like to grow GE crops — is not sufficient,” she said.

The couple’s financial loss was “purely hypothetical” because they likely could have earned as much money from continuing to grow hay on the property or by switching to organic sugar beets, intervenors argue.

“Really all they have is a hope to grow GE crops someday in the future,” said Wischerath.

John DiLorenzo, attorney for the plaintiffs, countered that these allegations are both false and irrelevant.

“The Whites have shown much more than is necessary to show their standing,” he said.

Syngenta did contract with the couple to grow biotech sugar beets in previous years but did not enter into a new contract due to the GMO ordinance, he said.

As for the lease agreement, it remains valid even if there’s no expiration date and the landowner is willing to renegotiate payment terms, DiLorenzo said.

Regardless of whether they can prove a financial hardship, plaintiffs can still seek to invalidate a regulation that affects them under Oregon law, he said.

“They’re affected by the ordinance as it’s applied. Nothing further is required,” he said. “It does not matter how much they might have made if they’d been allowed to grow GMO crops.”

Apart from the question of standing, the parties also debated whether the 2013 statute that pre-empts local GMO restrictions runs afoul of Oregon’s constitution.

“We contend that law is unconstitutionally vague,” said Dolan.

Lawmakers impermissibly disallowed local rules for GMOs without creating a statewide scheme for governing such crops, she said.

“What we’re left with is a regulatory void,” Dolan said.

The pre-emption statute doesn’t contain any protections for organic and conventional farmers, she said.

“The law instead creates a novel vacuum,” she said.

The plaintiffs argued that a statewide regulatory system isn’t necessary to pre-empt local restrictions on GMOs — it’s sufficent that lawmakers didn’t want Oregon’s 36 counties to establish their own GMO rules.

Oregon also pre-empts local governments from enacting rent controls or regulating shooting ranges, among other issues, DiLorenzo said.

“It is the legislature’s right to trust in the market sometimes,” he said.

Intervenors drew a parallel between Oregon’s pre-emption statute and a law that was struck down in Ohio, which prohibited local restrictions on the foods that can be served at restaurants.

An appellate court in Ohio overturned that law because the state didn’t establish its own regulations over food content in restaurants. Supporters of the GMO ordinance say that the current test of Josephine County’s “home rule” authority is a unique case of “first impression” in Oregon, so the Ohio case should guide the judge’s thinking.

“It’s persuasive and strikingly similar,” Dolan said.

DiLorenzo said the Ohio decision has no bearing on the situation because Oregon has different legal standards for when the state can pre-empt local regulations.

In Ohio, lawmakers must cross several additional hurdles in passing a statute that can pre-empt local ordinance, he said. “Oregon’s home rule authority is not as extensive.”

Access the article here.

"Federal judge orders Eugene School District to compensate" significant win by Melissa Wischerath on behalf of autistic 4J student

By Alisha Roemeling,  The Register-Guard,   

April 16, 2016

 

A federal judge has ordered the Eugene School District to provide nearly 600 hours of compensatory schooling to an autistic teenage girl whom the district failed to properly evaluate and appropriately educate, and who as a result spent two years at South Eugene High School with little to show for it.

Grace Williams said she and her parents asked the district repeatedly to place her on an Individualized Education Plan, or IEP, but the district took nearly two years to do that. During her two years at South, Williams said, she earned 1.5 credits. In Oregon, a student must earn 24 credits, or on average six a year, for a high school diploma.

U.S. District Judge Michael McShane has ordered the district to provide Williams, now 19, with 570 hours of compensatory education as part of his March 29 ruling that the district denied her “free and appropriate public education” between September 2012 and May 2014, and repeatedly violated the ­federal Individuals with ­Disabilities Education Act.

“There is no dispute that the district violated the (law) in several ways,” McShane wrote in his judgment. “At times, the violations were so egregious that plaintiffs felt the district intentionally retaliated against them.”

School district spokeswoman Kerry Delf said the district will obey the judge’s ruling.

“The Eugene School District strives to provide a quality educational ­experience for every child,” Delf said. “The district will continue to serve the ­student.”

Delf had no additional comment about the ruling. She would not comment on whether the district would appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

 

The suit, filed by Williams and her parents in December 2013, sought continued education for Williams but no monetary damages. However, Grace Williams’ mother, Mary Beth Williams, said the family expects to sue later this year or next for compensation for emotional damages.

“This (the current lawsuit) is just for her ­current and past education,” Mary Beth Williams said. “She suffered emotionally, as well.”

Mary Beth Williams said the family has spent thousands of dollars on an attorney for the case. Following McShane’s ruling, the family has asked the district to pay at least $70,000 in attorney fees.

That ruling is pending.

The suit identifies Grace Williams and her parents by initials only. However, Grace Williams, Mary Beth Williams and Eric Brunner-Williams agreed to be identified for this article.

Grace Williams said she wants to advocate for other students going through similar problems.

“My story isn’t something that is an isolated event. There are a lot of kids badly treated by the school district, and if we don’t tell people about it, then they’re going to keep hurting kids with disabilities just like myself.”

“Grace’s bill”

Grace Williams is no stranger to the limelight. Driven by her struggles with the school district, she brought her concerns to Salem last May to testify before the Legislature on what became known as “Grace’s bill.”

The bill, signed into law by Gov. Kate Brown in July, requires truancy notices to inform parents or guardians of their right to request an evaluation for an IEP for their child. An IEP, developed for each public school child eligible for special education, is intended to help children with disabilities.

“Grace’s bill” directs districts across Oregon to determine if a child has a disability, and whether truancy or unexcused absences stem from that. The bill prohibits scheduling an attendance conference with parents until an IEP evaluation has been conducted.

Williams, diagnosed with autism shortly before her sophomore year of high school, enrolled at South Eugene High School for the 2012-13 school year in hopes of a new start.

Williams and her family had just moved from Ithaca, N.Y., where she endured emotional trauma after being sexually assaulted on school grounds, at age 13, according to Mary Beth Williams. Two years ­after the assault, in March 2012, Grace was hospitalized for depression after two suicide attempts, her mother said.

Upon arriving in Eugene, Grace and her parents were reassured by South Eugene staff that the high school was “the perfect place for her,” Mary Beth Williams said in a phone interview.

The parents asked the district to evaluate Grace Williams for special education services so she might obtain an IEP, but the district denied those requests for more than a year, ­according to state ­education and federal court documents.

In November 2012, ­after several months at South, Grace Williams ­began to struggle, academically and emotionally, her mother said.

Mary Beth Williams said her daughter started having emotional meltdowns at school and began to miss class as a result.

“She gets upset and cries, and she really can’t be reasoned with,” Mary Beth Williams said. “I don’t want to say catatonic, but when she’s in that state you can’t really reach her.”

IEP established

Mary Beth Williams said her daughter is considered gifted and smart, making it difficult for others to notice her disability.

“When she was evaluated by the district, she was determined to be gifted,” Mary Beth Williams said. Oregon state law defines a gifted student as one who tests in the 97th percentile or higher in intellect compared to his or her peers.

By February 2013, the district had taken note of the class time Grace Williams had been missing. It sent several mail and phone truancy notices to the family, according to federal court documents. Mary Beth Williams said that after meetings, calls and emails, the district still had not evaluated her daughter for an IEP.

In April 2013, Mary Beth Williams said she called Cheryl Linder, the district’s director of educational support systems, to discuss Grace Williams getting an IEP.

“All we heard back was that she wasn’t eligible and they would get back to us,” she said.

The following school year, Grace Williams enrolled in the International High School program at South in hopes it might have smaller class sizes and less stress, Mary Beth Williams said.

By December 2013, Grace Williams still had not been evaluated for an IEP, so her parents filed a complaint with the state Department of Education. The state ruled the school district was at fault and directed it to complete its evaluation by April 1, 2014, court documents show.

During the evaluation process, Grace Williams still was being reported for missing school and was asked to see a truancy officer, her mother said.

When the family opted not to meet with the officer — because it felt completing the IEP evaluation was a higher priority — the truancy officer came to the family’s home and accidentally crashed into the family’s car, Mary Beth Williams said.

The incident ­upset Grace Williams, who thought her parents were being arrested, Mary Beth Williams said. Grace struck her head, suffered a concussion and “didn’t leave the house for two weeks,” she said.

In February 2014, the district found Grace ­Williams to be eligible for special education services under two classifications: autism and emotional disturbance. An IEP was established during meetings in May, and the Williams family received the IEP on June 19, 2014, court documents show.

“Everything seemed to be on the right track,” Mary Beth Williams said.

Grace thriving now

For summer 2014, Grace Williams enrolled at the Looking Glass Center Point School, an alternative school on West 11th Avenue that offers academic services “in a therapeutic school environment for middle and high school youth with emotional and neurological and/or ­behavioral issues,” according to its website.

Grace Williams did not thrive there, however, and hoped to enroll in the fall at Wellsprings Friends School — a private alternative high school in west Eugene that serves teens who have difficulty ­learning at conventional high schools.

By the time she finished up at Center Point, she was 17 and had lost nearly two years of her high school education, the family contended. Her parents felt she needed additional evaluation; they approached district officials, whose response they considered unsatisfactory.

Mary Beth Williams and Eric Brunner-­Williams in September 2014 filed a request for a due process hearing with the state Department of Education to determine how many hours of compensatory ­educational time the district owed Grace Williams. The case went to an administrative law judge, ­Alison Greene Webster.

Greene determined the district owed Grace Williams 570 hours of “specially designed instruction” in math, social skills, organizational skills and transition training. But the parties disagreed on whether those hours should be reduced because of the 23 days Grace ­Williams had been sick before May 2014, and because of the 156 hours she attended at Center Point.

Greene concluded the student’s sick days should not be deducted, but that the 156 hours spent at Center Point were compensatory and could be deducted from the total of 570 hours.

McShane reversed that, saying the district failed to provide placement documents for Center Point and failed to discuss ­Center Point as being compensatory until one year after the Williams family had accepted Grace Williams’ placement there.

Mary Beth Williams said her daughter is attending Wellsprings and the University of Oregon, and has nearly a 4.0 grade point average at both. Grace Williams receives most of her special education at Asperger Support Network in west Eugene, where she spends about two hours each day.

Time crunch

The district can provide the 570 hours of instruction by contracting with alternative schools and service providers.

The court-mandated time equals about 28 weeks of schooling at 20 hours a week, for example.

The district uses alternative education providers in Eugene, such as Wellsprings and the Riverfront School and Career Center, spokeswoman Delf said. Currently, 368 district students are in alternative education placements, including 37 at Wellsprings.

Oregon school districts receive extra money from the state to cover services for students with ­disabilities.

For students at Wellsprings, the district typically pays $40 per student per full day of instruction, or about $7,000 for a full school year. The district also contracts with Asperger Support Network, where group sessions cost $45 per hour per student and individual sessions are $75 per hour.

Grace Williams spends about 16 hours a week at Wellsprings and receives about 10 hours of individual instruction a week at ASN, Mary Beth Williams said. Additionally, the teenager takes about six hours a week of classes at the UO.

Grace Williams most likely will not attend a traditional Eugene district school again, as her work at Wellsprings, Asperger Support and the UO all count toward fulfilling her credits for a high school diploma.

But she faces a time crunch to obtain all credits through the Eugene School District before her 21st birthday in September 2017, when she becomes ineligible for ­district service.

“She only earned 1.5 credits in the two years she spent in the district without an IEP,” Mary Beth Williams said, “so she has to do it rather quickly.”

Mary Beth Williams said her daughter is in school from about 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. every day. She aspires to be a doctor.

“She’s amazing,” Mary Beth Williams said.

Access the story here.

"County ordered to pay $25,418" significant verdict achieved by Melissa Wischerath on behalf of a Eugene client

"County ordered to pay $25,418" headline of article in the Register Guard reporting on significant verdict achieved by Melissa Wischerath on behalf of a Eugene client. This verdict sends a message to Lane county that they need to take our Fourth Amendment and 14th Amendment civil liberties seriously.

A United States District of Oregon seven person jury awarded plaintiff Donald Long $418.00 in economic damages and $25,000.00 in noneconomic damages for an unreasonable seizure of a vehicle, failure to train staff conducting impoundment hearings, and a custom of conducting impoundment hearings that would lead to a deprivation of constitutional rights.

“This verdict sends a message to the County that they need to take our 4th Amendment and 14th Amendment civil liberties seriously.” Said lead attorney Melissa Wischerath of the Law Office of M.D. Wischerath.

The case arose after the plaintiff, Donald Long of Eugene, had his truck towed from a Shell gasoline station for noncriminal traffic violations. Additionally, the county failed to provide the plaintiff with a meaningful hearing after the tow.        

“As for the failure to train, while the Lane County Sheriff’s Office may very well have a policy on how a hearing on impoundment is supposed to be conducted, it’s crystal clear that they’ve yet to train anyone on it."

Right now they’re using the citation issued by the impounding officer at the time of the tow to uphold a decision to tow. This is in violation of ORS§ 809.716,  a section of Oregon law that requires the impounding officer to appear or submit an affidavit in lieu of an appearance. A written citation is not an affidavit under the law, and certainly is not an appearance.” Wischerath added.

Click here for more coverage of the case, http://www.registerguard.com/rg/news/local/31439075-75/county-car-gill-vehicle-eugene.html.csp

Earned Sick Leave, Preemption, and the Powers of Local Government

Please join us for a panel discussion about preemption at 7 pm on Thursday, October 23 in room 110 of the Knight Law Center on the University of Oregon campus. Preemption is a growing topic here in Oregon and across the country as local governments struggle to innovate and come up with creative solutions to pressing topics of our time including inequality and environmental degradation.

This discussion will focus on an immediate concern involving Lane County’s attempt to preempt Eugene’s sick leave ordinance. Preemption was also a prominent issue in Oregon last fall with the state’s preemption of County attempts to regulate the use of genetically modified seeds.

Our speakers include:

Paul Diller, expert on Home Rule, teaches in the Law department at Willamette University

Jim Edmunson, Eugene attorney, former legislator in office when the state preempted local anti-gay ordinances

Ken Tollenaar, elderly civil servant known around Eugene as the eminence grise behind civil law; helped write the Home Rule referendum passed in 1954, former president of the Association of Oregon Counties

Pete Sorenson, county commissioner, former legislator and legislative assistant in the U.S. House of Representatives

Melissa Wischerath, Eugene attorney, will be the moderator

Reference Materials of interest include:

Eugene Weekly article quoting Melissa Wischerath:
http://www.eugeneweekly.com/20140807/news-briefs/county-commission%E2%80%99s-anti-sick-leave-ordinances-questioned

National article of country-wide preemption and sick leave laws: http://www.prwatch.org/news/2014/07/12551/paid-sick-days-gain-momentum-as-alec-allies-push-back

Paul Diller on home rule (40 pages):  http://law.uoregon.edu/org/olrold/archives/87/Diller.pdf

League of Oregon Cities 2006 publicationon home rule (25 pages):  http://www.orcities.org/Portals/17/Premium/HomeRule06newcover2012.pdf

County Home Rule in Oregon, prepared by Ken Tollenaar for the Association of Oregon Counties (129 pages):  http://www.aocweb.org/aoc/Portals/0/Policy%20Center/County%20Home%20Rule%20Paper.pdf

Text of one of the county ordinances preempting Eugene’s sick leave ordinance:
http://www.lanecounty.org/Departments/BCC/Documents/ORDINANCES/2014/14-04.pdf

Register Guard article on reaction to county’s ordinances:
http://registerguard.com/rg/news/local/31900391-75/story.csp

Ken Tollenaar’s letter to Register Guard regarding the Lane County/city of Eugene conflict:
http://registerguard.com/rg/opinion/31900496-78/county-government-rule-counties-eugene.html.csp

National Association of Counties article 2004 article about Dillon’s Rule – posted at CELDF:  http://www.celdf.org/downloads/Home%20Rule%20State%20or%20Dillons%20Rule%20State.pdf